Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Publications"
Infobroker (talk | contribs) (to do note) |
Infobroker (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{editMark |
|notes = | |notes = | ||
TO DO: Better formatting of page, smaller (thinner) image banner at the top | TO DO: Better formatting of page, smaller (thinner) image banner at the top | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
DO NOT BUILD THE IMAGE TABLE HERE. We will user templates and parser functions to automatically build the structure from entries on the issue pages themselves. | DO NOT BUILD THE IMAGE TABLE HERE. We will user templates and parser functions to automatically build the structure from entries on the issue pages themselves. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''JB''' what if we get rid of the Order of Publication sub group and just used that classification system for the main page, at least for the time being? The Order of Publication page looks better, even if it isn't alphabetized. Just a thought. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Astrozac|Astrozac]] ([[User talk:Astrozac|talk]]) 01:42, 10 July 2014 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | :I'm fine with that. --[[User:Infobroker|Infobroker]] ([[User talk:Infobroker|talk]]) 08:37, 11 July 2014 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:37, 11 July 2014
|
|
Mr. Smartie Notes: TO DO: Better formatting of page, smaller (thinner) image banner at the top paragraph for each Astro City Series (in order), with publication dates, image "table" for each issue (and link) DO NOT BUILD THE IMAGE TABLE HERE. We will user templates and parser functions to automatically build the structure from entries on the issue pages themselves. |
JB what if we get rid of the Order of Publication sub group and just used that classification system for the main page, at least for the time being? The Order of Publication page looks better, even if it isn't alphabetized. Just a thought.
--Astrozac (talk) 01:42, 10 July 2014 (PDT)
- I'm fine with that. --Infobroker (talk) 08:37, 11 July 2014 (PDT)
